Google DeepMind partners with A24 and invests 75 million dollars to create AI tools for film
Google's artificial intelligence lab, DeepMind, has announced a research and development partnership with A24, one of the most influential independent film studios in Hollywood in recent years.
Google's artificial intelligence lab, DeepMind, has announced a research and development partnership with A24, one of the most influential independent film studios in Hollywood in recent years. The news, published on June 22, 2026, by The Verge based on information from the Wall Street Journal, confirms that Google is investing approximately $75 million in A24, which represents the first time the company has taken an equity stake in a film studio.
The deal has as its stated objective the development of new film production technologies that will help the filmmakers of the future 'expand their narrative possibilities.' In Google's own words, published on its official announcement blog, 'the collaboration unites a world-leading research lab with the most filmmaker-oriented studio in the industry to help artists develop new workflows and techniques.' The company adds that this 'ensures the tools of the future are shaped by the creators who use them,' a phrase that seems designed to soften the resistance this type of deal usually generates in the creative community.
According to the Wall Street Journal, Google and A24 intend to create new tools for both the production and distribution of films. Google's own statement points out that 'the initial focus is on bridging cutting-edge technology with next-generation entertainment,' although no specific film in which Google will be involved is mentioned. The collaboration is expected to span 'multiple projects over time,' without a specific number or concrete timeline having been specified.
The multi-year deal is, according to the WSJ, non-exclusive in nature, which means that A24 could also collaborate with other technology companies without that violating the terms of the pact. Another relevant detail the article notes is that Google will not have access to A24's film and television content library, a point that was probably the subject of intense negotiation given the climate of litigiousness surrounding the use of copyrighted materials to train artificial intelligence models.
This last issue is not minor. The article notes that the partnership 'will likely raise some eyebrows in the film industry,' given that Google's AI models are trained with public data available on the internet and that other major studios such as Disney, Universal and Warner Bros have waged fierce legal battles against AI companies over alleged copyright infringements. A24's decision to partner with Google without ceding access to its catalog can be interpreted as an attempt to retain creative and legal control over its works, while benefiting from the investment and technological capabilities of the Mountain View giant.
One of the most striking aspects of the article has to do with Kane Parsons, a YouTube creator known as the director of 'Backrooms,' who is among the artists on A24's existing roster that Google and the studio hope to include in the deal. The irony is notable: according to an interview published in The Australian in early June 2026, Parsons himself declared that 'generative AI feels less like an innovation than a symptom of a broader cultural and economic rot,' and that he gets 'no enjoyment' from using the technology in any project. The article offers no clarification on whether Parsons has changed his position after the announcement or whether his inclusion in the deal occurred with or without his prior knowledge, which leaves open an important question about the real degree of artist buy-in to this initiative.
The one who has come out to publicly defend the project's approach is Scott Belsky, a partner at A24 and previously chief strategy officer at Adobe. In statements to the WSJ, Belsky stated that the tools Google and A24 are developing 'will look nothing like the kind of prompt-based generation that people feel uncomfortable with,' and added that 'there are better uses that preserve creative control and support risk-taking.' This distinction between prompt-based generative AI—the kind that produces images, videos or texts from textual instructions—and other types of assistance tools more integrated into the creative workflow is central to the discourse with which both companies are presenting the deal to the industry.
In broader terms, this Google move into Hollywood illustrates a clear trend in the tech sector: the major AI companies are seeking to anchor themselves in the entertainment industry not only as infrastructure providers, but as partners in content creation and the development of specialized tools. The $75 million bet on A24 is significant because this studio has a consolidated reputation for backing high-quality auteur projects—with titles such as 'Everything Everywhere All at Once,' 'Midsommar' or 'Hereditary'—which gives Google a credible showcase before filmmakers and screenwriters who might otherwise be reluctant to associate their work with a technology corporation.
Ultimately, the DeepMind-A24 deal represents one of the first documented attempts to integrate state-of-the-art artificial intelligence capabilities directly into the production fabric of a prestigious film studio, with a real financial investment as a signal of long-term commitment. The concrete technical details about which tools will be developed, how they will work and when they will be available to filmmakers remain undisclosed, so we will have to wait for the first concrete projects to assess whether the promise of 'preserving creative control' translates into something tangible or remains corporate rhetoric.